Join the Citizens for Crown Land Protection
Several organizations have offered cautious or conditional support for the MKCR proposal through a Joint Statement or Position Letter.
Click each name below to explore key excerpts, added context, and questions worth asking. At the bottom you will find the images of the statements made.
Each group cites consultation, collaboration, or ongoing dialogue as the basis for its involvement. Many use conditional language—supporting the initiative “so long as” access is maintained, or backing it in collaboration with groups like the Haliburton Highlands Land Trust (HHLT).
However, none of these organizations will have control over the final outcome. Once a Conservation Reserve is designated, all future decisions rest solely with the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP). There is no formal mechanism to uphold the conditions referenced in their support.
This raises a central contradiction:
If HHLT has no authority, why are these groups aligning with them?
If HHLT does have informal influence, then it may play a role in shaping future access—and that influence can just as easily be used to limit it.
If HHLT truly has no post-designation role, then its leading position in promoting MKCR, and the process surrounding it, deserves closer scrutiny.
HHLT is not a neutral facilitator. It is the primary proponent of the MKCR designation, actively leading the campaign while openly acknowledging that it will not manage the land once designation is complete.
And yet, organizations like OFAH continue to offer support “so long as there is no loss of opportunity for hunters, anglers, and trappers.”
But support for what, exactly?
If the outcome cannot be guaranteed—and if the designation is permanent and irreversible—then why support the process at all?
Why not support the people instead?
Support the residents and municipalities who were never consulted.
Support the hunters, anglers, trappers, and recreational users who depend on this land—and who will be the first to feel the impact of any future restrictions.
Because ultimately:
You do not protect opportunity by supporting a process you do not control.
You protect it by refusing to support initiatives that permanently transfer that control away in the first place.
This is not just about one reserve.
Today it’s “only” 8%. Tomorrow, maybe it’s the rest. (It’s already 14% of Crown Land.)
When organizations tasked with defending public access begin endorsing proposals they won’t have a role in managing, the issue isn’t just whether access might change—it’s whether they should be supporting a recommendation that could permanently shift decision-making away from the people who use and care for the land.
Because this isn’t just about what happens after designation.
It’s about whether this proposal should move forward at all.
Once the MKCR recommendation is submitted to the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry (MNRF)—and potentially on to MECP—it enters a process that communities, organizations, and local users no longer control. While there may be formal consultations, there is no binding mechanism to ensure that access, use, or collaborative stewardship will be preserved in the long term.
So it’s fair to ask:
If the designation is permanent…
If no group retains decision-making power afterward…
And if the foundational promises can’t be enforced…
Then what exactly is being supported?
Rather than endorsing a proposal based on conditions no one can guarantee, we believe support should be directed toward the residents, municipalities, and land users who were not adequately consulted—and who will be directly affected.
You protect access by staying involved in the process—not by stepping aside when control is handed off.
And you protect communities by ensuring they’re at the table before decisions are made—not after.
Staying at the table without questioning the direction of the process is not the same as defending access.
It risks sending a signal of tacit approval—that the proposal is acceptable as long as they are included, even if the public loses all meaningful say once the designation is complete.
If the goal is to protect opportunity and represent users on the ground, then presence alone is not enough.
Position matters.
Once a Conservation Reserve is approved, all authority rests with the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks. The designation is permanent, and any support offered—conditional or otherwise—cannot be withdrawn after the fact. We urge this organization to revisit its position while the designation is still under consideration. Once approved by the Ministry, there will be no mechanism to withdraw support or protect against future changes. If you are an active member or supporter of this organization, consider contacting them directly to respectfully encourage a reconsideration of their position—your voice carries weight, and now is the time to use it.
Contact Number: 705-457-8780
Email Address: info@haliburtonatv.com
Website: https://haliburtonatv.com/
While the statement includes perspectives from several organizations — such as the Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters (OFAH), Ontario Trails Protection Alliance (OTPA), and others — HATVA’s position has not been publicly included.
The Haliburton Highlands Land Trust (HHLT) has expressed a broader commitment to engaging with motorized trail users, and references collaboration with the off-road community in general. However, there is currently no direct comment or endorsement from HATVA included in the official statement.
As discussions around Crown land designations continue, it's important to ensure clarity around which organizations are actively participating — and which are not — in shaping or endorsing these proposals.
Contact Number: 705-328-0931/705-328-4482
Website: https://katva.ca/
Mailing Address: PO Box 21, Lindsay, ON K9V 4R8
In the Joint Statement supporting the proposed Milburn Kendrick Conservation Reserve (MKCR), Carolyn Richards, President of the Kawartha ATV Association (KATVA), says:
“By working together with HHLT, the off-road community can build a sustainable model that can be used across the province to protect trail access as Crown land designations change and conservation efforts evolve.”
At first glance, it sounds cooperative — even optimistic.
But read it again. Carefully.
This isn’t just about one reserve. This is about building a model — a framework meant to be replicated across Ontario. A model built not by the public, but by land trusts, external funders, and conservation strategists.
“As Crown land designations change…”
That single phrase should set off alarms.
It’s an open admission that land use is already shifting — and instead of defending long-standing access rights, we’re helping usher in a system that accepts those changes as inevitable.
And not just accepts them — endorses them.
This is how trail systems — yours, mine, and everyone else's — become test cases in a province-wide rollout of “cooperative” conservation. Once implemented, these models can lock in new land use policies with minimal local oversight, guided instead by well-funded external players and evolving provincial frameworks.
This isn’t the protection of what we have.
It’s the quiet restructuring of how land use is decided — and who gets a seat at that table.
Let’s be honest: if this was about safeguarding access, it would be about standing firm as policy changes, not adapting to fit within them.
Contact info: info@oftr.ca
Website: https://oftr.ca
Phone: 1-855-637-6387
Address: 246372 Hockley Road, Mono, ON L9W 6K4
Lisa Thomson, OTPA Chair
Email: Lisa.thompson@oftr.ca
Phone: 705-466-2747
In the Joint Statement on the proposed Milburn Kendrick Conservation Reserve (MKCR), Joel Castonguay, OFTR President, stated:
“We certainly had some initial concerns... but after a really good exchange, it’s clear we’ve got a tremendous opportunity to protect and grow our access.”
The quote reflects a shift in tone — from concern to optimism. But this message was shared publicly on behalf of Ontario’s trail riders, without any clear indication that the broader riding community was consulted.
When permanent Crown land designations are being proposed, riders deserve more than a statement.
They deserve to be asked.
Contact information: https://www.of4wd.com
President: Peter Wood
Email: info@of4wd.com
Address: 420 Main Street East, Unit 720, Milton, ON L9T 5G3
In the Joint Statement regarding the proposed Milburn Kendrick Conservation Reserve (MKCR), Peter Wood, President of OF4WD, stated:
“This is a great and ground-breaking opportunity to work together with the conservation community on what we hope will be a long-term, collaborative effort.”
The tone is optimistic, highlighting the potential for partnership. But it also raises an important question: who is this collaboration actually with?
OF4WD’s quote refers to working with the Haliburton Highlands Land Trust (HHLT) — but HHLT will not manage the land if MKCR is designated.
Conservation Reserves in Ontario are managed by the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry (MNRF) — not by land trusts, not by trail groups, and not by partner organizations.
Once designated, decisions about permitted uses, restrictions, and land access are made by the Province, through a Conservation Reserve Manager. Neither HHLT nor OF4WD will have authority over those decisions.
So while the word “collaborative” appears in the statement, the reality is that final control does not rest with the people sitting around the table today.
Real collaboration includes decision-making power.
In this case, that power resides entirely with the Province.
Website: https://www.ofahfoundation.org
Address: 4601 Guthrie Drive, Peterborough, ON K9J 6Y3
Phone: (705) 748-6324 | Fax: (705) 748-9577
Contact: Matt Robbins – Fish & Wildlife Biologist, OFAH
In the Joint Statement, Matt Robbins, Fish & Wildlife Biologist with the Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters (OFAH), stated:
“A collaborative approach to protecting and enhancing our natural resources is not only necessary but critical to ensure our respective interests are represented and that conservation efforts are broadly supported.”
In a clarification issued on April 1, 2025, OFAH further stated:
“Since 2023, the OFAH has worked in collaboration with the Haliburton Highlands Land Trust (HHLT) to ensure there is no loss of opportunity for hunters, anglers, and trappers as a result of this initiative.”
This presents two notable admissions:
If OFAH is working to “ensure” opportunities are not lost, then there is a recognized risk that they could be. You do not work to protect what is already guaranteed.
In the same clarification, OFAH noted:
“Conservation Reserves are managed by the provincial government, not land trusts, the OFAH, or any other non-government entity.”
This confirms that once the proposed Milburn Kendrick Conservation Reserve (MKCR) is designated, neither OFAH nor HHLT will have a role in land management. Responsibility will rest entirely with the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP) under the Provincial Parks and Conservation Reserves Act, 2006.
The Schad Foundation, a Toronto-based environmental foundation, is a well-known supporter of conservation efforts across Ontario. Through its program, the Ontario Conservation Accelerator (OCA), the Foundation has provided key funding and coordination for the Highlands Corridor initiative, including the proposed Milburn Kendrick Conservation Reserve (MKCR).
In the Joint Statement, the Schad Foundation is credited for its support, and Peter Kendall, Executive Director, is quoted directly:
“The dedicated efforts of this community are responsible for many of the world-class trails we have in Ontario. We look forward to working with the motorized trail use community and leveraging their wealth of knowledge, experience, and expertise to advocate for greater protection and expansion of Ontario’s trails.”
— Peter Kendall, Executive Director, Schad Foundation
It’s a strong statement of support for motorized trail users — and it’s encouraging to see recognition of their contributions. But for a proposal that affects tens of thousands of hectares of Crown land, the absence of any mention of hunting, angling, or trapping stands out. Peter Kendall says nothing in his blurb about supporting hunting. Nothing about preserving access for Ontario’s longstanding outdoors traditions.
And that silence? Feels like Spring Bear Hunt déjà vu. For many in the hunting community, that’s not just a red flag — it’s a familiar pattern.
This isn’t a criticism — it’s about awareness. The public deserves to understand who’s involved, what their role is, and how initiatives like MKCR are developed.
The financial and in-kind support to BMFC for signing off on MKCR? From the Schad Foundation.
The “Ontario Conservation Accelerator” mentioned in the Joint Statement? That’s their program.
The Ontario Trails Protection Alliance (OTPA) is listed as a supporter in the Joint Statement promoting the Milburn Kendrick Conservation Reserve (MKCR). It is represented by Lisa Thomson, who is also affiliated with the Ontario Federation of Trail Riders (OFTR).
While the name suggests a broad coalition advocating for trail access, there is no public record of OTPA existing prior to this initiative. It has no website, no documented member organizations, and no track record of public advocacy.
Based on the timing and lack of visibility, OTPA appears to have been formed specifically to support or participate in the MKCR process — not as an established voice for Ontario trail users.
It’s referred to as a “collaborative organization” — but that raises a simple, important question:
Collaborating with who?
Not with local riders.
Not with the broader public.
Not with landowners, hunters, or long-time trail users in this region.
OTPA may appear in a Joint Statement, but there's no evidence it was built from the ground up, with input from the communities it now claims to represent.
Administered by: Schad Foundation
Located at: 273 CHARLOTTE STREET. PETERBOROUGH, ON K9J2V3
Website: https://theoca.ca/
Key staff: Peter Kendall (Board Member), Luke Ridgway (Manager, OCA) Mike Hendren (Executive Director)
The Joint Statement refers to the Ontario Conservation Accelerator (OCA) and acknowledges its role, but the broader public may not immediately connect the dots between this program and the more familiar Haliburton Highlands Land Trust (HHLT) or the Milburn Kendrick Conservation Reserve (MKCR) proposal. Raising awareness of OCA’s involvement simply provides more transparency around how these conservation initiatives are developed, funded, and coordinated.
Notably, Peter Kendall (Executive Director of the Schad Foundation) and Mike Hendren (Ontario Conservation Accelerator) are both named in the Ontario government’s “Working with Conservation Experts to Protect More Natural Areas” announcement — a provincial initiative focused on increasing protected areas through strategic partnerships.
This places both individuals, and by extension their organizations, in influential roles not just locally, but within Ontario’s broader strategy for land conservation.
Svetlana Zeran, RPF – General Manager
Box 1509, 51 Hastings Street North, Bancroft, Ontario K0L 1C0
Phone: 613-332-6890
Website: www.bmfci.ca
BMFC has publicly stated its support for the proposed Milburn Kendrick Conservation Reserve (MKCR) because the area is considered “low-value forest” with “no economic use.” In practical terms, this is land they weren’t logging — and weren’t going to.
They’ve also said:
“We prefer to work collaboratively rather than risk losing more productive lands without our input.”
Translation: Give up the land that doesn’t generate profit, to secure continued access to the land that does.
In return for their cooperation, BMFC acknowledged receiving:
“financial and in-kind support” — reportedly from the Schad Foundation and/or the Haliburton Highlands Land Trust (HHLT).
No details. No transparency.
Just support — and money.
Enough said.